Back to the prompt
Step by step

Audit a brief's structure and logic before filing

This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.

Paste the brief or the full argument section. Keep headings and record cites in; they are what gets audited.

Which brief this is and what stage the case is at.

The court that decides this, and whose substantive law applies.

Exactly what you want the court to do: the tree should terminate here.

Word count remaining, filing date, and any court-specific formatting rules that limit restructuring.

Watch for these throughout

  • This audit is structural. It will not catch a misstated holding, a bad pin cite, or a quotation that does not appear in the source. Verify authorities separately.
  • The model regularly treats dicta as holding when assessing what a cited case stands for. Confirm the proposition against the opinion itself.
  • Some "missing" arguments were dropped for preservation, waiver, or client reasons. Check your own file before adding anything back.
  • Do not paste unfiled work product or client-confidential material unless your firm's AI policy and the client's engagement terms permit it.
  • Restructuring late costs word count and citation checking. Weigh every recommendation against the filing date before acting on it.