Analyze a statute against the conduct you actually have
This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Paste the operative text plus the definitions section, or give a full citation with the version date.
Describe what the client actually does, operationally. Avoid legal labels; they beg the question.
The governing scheme, and any federal or state layer stacked on top of it.
The client and their posture under this scheme: already regulated, near a threshold, or arguing they fall outside it.
Whether the client wants the defensible reading or the safest one.
Watch for these throughout
Statutes and rules get amended and regulations get repromulgated. Confirm you are working from the current text and effective date before advising anyone.
Agency guidance, FAQs, and enforcement positions routinely reach further than the statutory text. Treat them as the agency's view, and check whether a court has ever endorsed it.
State schemes often layer on top of federal ones with different definitions and lower thresholds. Coverage under one says nothing about the other.
The model will state penalty figures and subsection numbers with total confidence. Verify every one against the code before it goes in a memo.
Do not paste client-identifying facts or product data into a general model unless your firm's AI policy and the client's engagement terms allow it.