Back to the prompt
Step by step

Spot Brady and Giglio issues in discovery

This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.

Federal or state court, the stage of the case, and any standing discovery order or local disclosure rule.

The production itself, or a detailed inventory by category with Bates ranges and dates. Detail here is what makes the absence audit work.

The counts, how the government proves them, and which witness the conviction actually depends on.

Everyone the government may call, plus anything you already know about deals, prior cooperation, or misconduct history.

Which tests, which lab, which analyst, and whether you have the underlying data or only the report.

Watch for these throughout

  • Disclosure obligations, timing rules, and the existence and name of police credibility-disclosure mechanisms differ sharply by jurisdiction and by court. Confirm the operative rule yourself; never take a deadline or a list name from the model.
  • The model reasons only from what you paste. It cannot know that a document is missing if you never described the category it belongs to. The absence audit is only as good as your inventory.
  • Aggressive discovery demands can trigger reciprocal disclosure obligations against you. Check what your request obligates you to produce before you send it.
  • Discovery often contains victim and witness identifying information and is frequently governed by a protective order. Confirm what you are permitted to put into any external tool before pasting.
  • "Helpful to the defense" and "material" are not the same standard, and a court may not order production of everything you are ultimately entitled to receive. Rank demands accordingly.