Back to the prompt
Step by step

Rewrite brief headings so they argue

This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.

Paste the heading list in order, indented to show which subheadings belong to which parent.

Your party and their posture: who is moving, appealing, or defending.

Exactly what you want the court to do. Every heading must point here.

The court and any local rule that governs heading or TOC format.

Watch for these throughout

  • The model will invent headings that were not in your input, or quietly merge two of yours. Diff the output list against your skeleton before pasting.
  • An argumentative heading can assert a fact the record does not support. Every factual claim in a heading needs a record cite in the section beneath it.
  • Local rules and some chambers' preferences govern heading form, TOC depth, and whether the standard of review gets its own section. Check before filing.
  • Long headings that read well in the table of contents can wrap to three lines in the body and look cluttered. Print a page before you commit.
  • Do not paste privileged or client-confidential material unless your firm's AI policy and the engagement terms permit it.