This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
The governing state, the court, and the relocation statute or leading case if you know it. This controls the entire framework.
Flips the structure entirely, and often the burden.
Destination, distance, reason, timing, job, housing, schools, family support, and what the child is leaving behind.
The operative schedule, the time actually exercised over the last year, notice given, objection filed, and prior litigation.
The schedule you will propose after the move, plus travel logistics and who pays. Leave blank and the outline will tell you what it needs.
Watch for these throughout
Relocation is a separate statutory scheme in many states, with its own notice contents, delivery method, objection window, and burden allocation. Verify every one against the current statute. Never rely on a remembered rule.
Which parent bears the burden often turns on custodial status or the percentage of time exercised. Getting it backwards restructures the entire brief and can lose the hearing.
Moving with the child before notice runs or before an order issues can forfeit the request and expose the client to contempt or an immediate return order.
International moves and moves involving an Indian child add Hague Convention and ICWA layers this outline does not address.
The model will import factor lists and standards from other states because they read plausibly. Check every factor against your own statute before it goes in the brief.