This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Interview notes in the client's own words. Include the questions you asked and the answers you did not get.
The ground you are pleading. For a social group, give the exact formulation you intend to defend; the outline will use yours, not invent one.
Asylum office or immigration court, the circuit, and where in the process you are.
Documents, photographs, medical records, and witnesses that exist, and who holds each.
Filing timing, prior entries or removals, statements already on the record, potential bars.
Language, interpretation, literacy, and what they can and cannot yet discuss. This changes how the outline is sequenced.
Watch for these throughout
The one-year filing deadline, its exceptions, and the bars to asylum are litigated constantly and differ by circuit. Confirm every threshold issue against current law and the actual record, never against what the model states.
Particular social group formulations shift with BIA and circuit decisions. The formulation must be yours and must be checked against current authority; a plausible-sounding group the model produces is not a viable one.
Every fact in this declaration will be tested under oath. A detail supplied to make a paragraph read better becomes an inconsistency at the hearing and a credibility finding in the decision.
Do not let the declaration be polished into fluent English the client does not speak. A witness who cannot recognize their own declaration on the stand loses credibility with it.
Intake notes about persecution are among the most sensitive records you will ever hold. Confirm your firm's AI policy and the client's informed consent before pasting them anywhere.