Draft an EB-1A cover brief that survives final merits
This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Where it will be adjudicated, whether premium processing is on, and which circuit's law governs on review.
Field and sub-field, education, current position, and the U.S. position they will hold.
What you actually hold for each criterion, with selection numbers, citation counts and pull dates, and who published what.
The specific continuing work, its funding, and its timeline. Vague plans read as a career change.
Each writer, what they will address, and whether they have ever co-authored or shared funding with the beneficiary.
Watch for these throughout
Most marginal EB-1A petitions die at final merits, not at the criteria count. A brief that proves six criteria and skips the totality argument is a brief that gets an RFE.
Selective-membership and award criteria turn on the selecting body's process. Get the selection statistics and the judging standard in writing. The model will happily characterize a society as selective without evidence.
Letters from co-authors, co-investigators, and licensing counterparties are discounted. Confirm the relationship before you request the letter, and disclose it rather than letting the officer find it.
Verify every citation to Kazarian, Visinscaia, Buletini, and the USCIS Policy Manual. The Manual is revised often and the model cites chapter numbers from older versions with full confidence.
Prospective work must be in the same field of extraordinary ability. A beneficiary whose stated plans drift toward management or a new area undercuts the whole petition.