This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Paste the IP, inventions, confidentiality, and post-employment sections, or the whole agreement.
Drives the work-for-hire analysis and whether an assignment is doing all the work.
Where the worker actually sits, plus what the agreement says governs; they are often different.
What they will actually create, in enough detail to test whether the scope reaches it.
Changes what counts as urgent: a signed agreement gets a remediation plan, not redlines.
Watch for these throughout
The distinction between "hereby assigns" and "agrees to assign" is not stylistic. A promise to assign in the future can leave title with the worker and defeat the company's claim. This is what Stanford v. Roche turned on.
Non-compete and invention-assignment law changes almost every year, by state and by legislature. Anything the model tells you about current enforceability needs to be confirmed against the statute before you rely on it.
Federal trade-secret law conditions certain remedies on giving the worker a written immunity notice. Omit it and you can lose exemplary damages and fees in a case you otherwise win.
The governing-law clause does not decide which state's restrictions apply. Several states void choice-of-law provisions that route around their own employee protections. Check where the worker sits.
Non-US workers frequently need country-specific formalities for a valid assignment, and moral rights are inalienable in some jurisdictions. US-style language alone is often not enough.