This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Correspondence, adjuster notes, reports, emails, invoices, with dates and page or bates references.
Each policy, its inception and expiration, form type, and any retroactive date.
The disputes the dates have to resolve: late notice, trigger, prior knowledge, exhaustion, allocation.
Whose law governs the policy and where the coverage case is or would be pending.
Witnesses and what each says about when something happened, with the transcript or statement cite.
The use, which decides how much argument belongs in the chronology and whether it will be produced.
Watch for these throughout
The model will smooth a chronology into a story if you let it. Check every [INFERRED] tag against the underlying document before you rely on an entry.
Whether late notice defeats coverage, and whether the carrier must show prejudice, varies by state and by whether the policy is occurrence or claims-made. Never take the consequence of a date from this output without confirming the rule.
A chronology you produce becomes an admission of your date positions and can be used to impeach your own witnesses. Decide early whether this is work product or an exhibit.
Imprecise dates are where cases are lost. "Late summer" and "around Thanksgiving" must stay imprecise in the table, not be converted to a day.
Do not paste an unproduced claim file or deposition testimony under a protective order into any tool your firm's AI policy does not cover.