Back to the prompt
Step by step

Draft a DMCA notice a reviewer can clear in 90 seconds

This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.

Owner, work title and description, registration number and date if any, and where the original lives.

One resolvable URL per item, with what was copied, how much, and when it was posted.

The service provider, its designated agent, and whether a queue reviewer or a lawyer reads it; this sets the format and the tone.

Who signs, in what capacity, and their contact details.

Your walk through the four factors before sending. Thin analysis here means the notice should not go out.

Watch for these throughout

  • A knowingly false or materially misleading notice creates liability under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), including fees. Overclaiming scope is the usual way this happens.
  • Lenz requires the sender to consider fair use before sending. Document that consideration in the file at the time, not after a demand letter arrives.
  • Send to the service provider's designated agent as listed in the Copyright Office directory. A notice to a general support address may not carry statutory effect.
  • Notices are routinely published to public transparency databases along with the URLs and the sender's name. Assume the uploader, the press, and the client's customers can read it.
  • If a counter-notice is filed the platform must restore the material in 10 to 14 business days unless the sender files suit. Make that decision before the notice goes out, not after.