This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Paste the complaint or the counts you want tested, keeping paragraph numbers.
Where you are filing and whose substantive law supplies the elements.
Facts backed by a document, a witness, or a declaration today: the only material a fix may draw on.
Limitations or exhaustion deadlines, and whether this plaintiff has filed or amended before.
Who is being sued and how aggressively they are likely to move.
Watch for these throughout
Pleading standards are not uniform. Twombly and Iqbal apply in federal court, many state courts have not adopted them, and statutory claims sometimes survive on thinner allegations. Confirm the standard in your forum before cutting a count.
Verify every citation before filing. A fabricated case or pin cite in a pleading is a Rule 11 problem, and courts have sanctioned lawyers for exactly this.
The model will confuse evidentiary weakness with pleading defect. A count that is hard to prove can still be perfectly pleaded. Do not amend it away.
Fixes are only as good as the facts you supply. If you do not tell it what you can prove, it will invent plausible-sounding allegations you cannot support.
This analysis is work product about your own client's filing. Keep it out of anything discoverable and out of tools your client has not approved.