Three turns and a check. Keep this open next to your chat: each step is the thing to paste next, with what you typed already carried across. Nothing is sent from here, and nothing on this page is a transcript. The conversation stays where you are having it.
Every input, category, and computation, plus the total.
What is pleaded, and which damages category attaches to which claim.
The law that decides what is recoverable, and where it will be decided.
The document, witness, or expert behind each input.
The destination, which changes the acceptable risk in the number.
Watch for, the whole way through
What is recoverable, how interest accrues, and from what date are forum-specific and often dispositive. The model will state all three confidently and wrongly. Confirm each.
The model can produce arithmetic that looks checked and is not. Reconcile every total yourself before any figure goes into a demand or a disclosure.
A number the client has already stated somewhere, in a board deck, an insurance claim, or a press release, becomes a ceiling or a floor. Find it before the other side does.
Double counting across theories is the most common defect and the hardest to see, because each category is defensible on its own.
Damages analysis is core work product. Do not paste privileged valuations or settlement positions unless your firm's AI policy and the engagement terms permit it.