Outline a rulemaking comment the agency can actually adopt
This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
What the rule does, its key provisions, the effective date, and the agency's stated rationale.
Where this gets filed and by when.
Who is filing, their stake in the rule, and exactly what they want changed.
Internal data, third-party studies, surveys, vendor quotes, with numbers and sources.
Statutory authority, reasoned decisionmaking, RFA, procedural defects: anything you may want later.
Watch for these throughout
Everything filed becomes part of the administrative record and is public and permanent. Do not include a position, a concession, or a cost figure you would not want quoted in litigation against you.
Verify every Federal Register page, docket number, and study result before filing. The model will produce plausible-looking citations that do not exist.
Late comments may be excluded entirely. Confirm the closing date and the submission method, and keep the regulations.gov receipt.
A comment that objects without proposing text rarely moves a rule, and a bare objection may not preserve the issue for judicial review.
Major questions and statutory-authority arguments cut both ways. Raising one signals the agency to build a defensive record in the final rule. Decide deliberately, not reflexively.