Find what the agency has said and what it is worth
Three turns and a check. Keep this open next to your chat: each step is the thing to paste next, with what you typed already carried across. Nothing is sent from here, and nothing on this page is a transcript. The conversation stays where you are having it.
What the business actually wants to know, in its own words.
The agency and, where it matters, the specific office or program.
The legal regime and where a dispute would be decided first.
Guidance, advisory opinions, or enforcement actions already in hand.
Which changes which sources matter most.
Watch for, the whole way through
The model will invent advisory opinion numbers, guidance titles, and enforcement actions that read as real. Nothing it names has been verified to exist.
Sub-regulatory guidance is withdrawn, rewritten, and archived without notice. Confirm that anything you rely on is currently published before it goes in advice.
How much weight a court gives agency interpretation has shifted and continues to shift. Do not carry a deference assumption from an older memo into new advice.
An enforcement pattern is evidence about the operative rule, not permission. The absence of a case may mean the conduct is tolerated, or that nobody has looked yet.
Do not paste client-confidential facts about a live regulatory matter unless your company's AI policy and any litigation hold permit it.