Back to the prompt

Step by step

Verify research you did not do yourself

Three turns and a check. Keep this open next to your chat: each step is the thing to paste next, with what you typed already carried across. Nothing is sent from here, and nothing on this page is a transcript. The conversation stays where you are having it.

Paste the research product exactly as you received it, footnotes included.

The question as it was actually posed to whoever wrote this.

The governing law and the forum the advice will be used in.

The origin, which changes which failure modes to look for first.

Any case, statute, or fact you hold that the memo does not deal with.

Watch for, the whole way through

  • This audit cannot tell you whether a cited case exists. A memo can pass every structural check here and rest entirely on authority that was invented. Pull the sources.
  • The model auditing the memo can hallucinate as readily as the model that wrote it. Treat any authority it names, including one it offers as contrary, as unverified.
  • A memo that reaches the conclusion you wanted is the one you will check least. That is the reason this prompt asks what you already believed.
  • Courts have sanctioned lawyers for filings built on fabricated authority. A [PULL IT] flag is an assignment to a human, not a disclaimer that moves the risk.
  • Do not paste privileged memoranda or client-confidential analysis unless your firm's AI policy and the engagement terms permit it.