All prompts
Workflow/Featured
Build an asset-purchase closing checklist
Turns a deal summary into a dated closing checklist (conditions, deliverables, consents, and filings) with a named owner on every line and every date back-solved from closing.
Your prompt
2
Pressure-test it
3
Go deeper
Before you run it
What to gather first
Watch for
What comes back
See an example of what you’ll get
Closing: Tuesday, June 30. All dates back-solved.
Conditions to closing
| # | Condition | Owner | Deadline | Dependency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bring-down certificate: reps true at closing | Seller officer | 6/29 | Final walk-through 6/27 |
| 2 | All required consents obtained or waived | Seller counsel | 6/24 | See consents table |
| 3 | No MAE: officer certificate | Seller officer | 6/30 | none |
| 4 | Title to assets free of liens | Seller counsel | 6/30 | Payoff letter, UCC-3s |
| 5 | Escrow agreement executed | Buyer counsel / escrow agent | 6/23 | Agent engaged 5/20 |
| 6 | Opinion of seller's counsel | Seller counsel | 6/29 | Form at APA Ex. C |
Consents: the critical path
| Counterparty | Trigger | Owner | Deadline | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indiana landlord | Lease § 14.2, no assignment without consent | Seller counsel | 6/12 | Requested 5/3, no response |
| Top-10 customers (10) | Anti-assignment in 7 of 10; 3 silent | Seller counsel + seller VP Sales | 6/20 | 6 of 7 returned |
| Software licensors (4) | Named-entity licenses, non-transferable | Buyer IT + seller counsel | 6/20 | 2 of 4 returned |
| Revolver lender | Payoff and release | Seller counsel | 6/29 | Quote requested 6/1 |
*Three customer contracts are silent on assignment. In an asset sale, silence generally permits assignment, but the counterparty can still refuse to perform. Send courtesy notices on 6/20 rather than requesting consent you do not need.*
IP: separate instruments, separate recordings
| Right | Instrument | Office | Record by |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 patents | Patent assignment | USPTO Assignment Recordation Branch | 7/7 |
| 8 trademarks | Trademark assignment with goodwill | USPTO | 7/7 |
| Software and manuals | Copyright assignment | U.S. Copyright Office | 7/30 |
Regulatory. HSR: transaction value $45M, below the current size-of-transaction threshold, so no filing [UNVERIFIED - confirm this year's adjusted threshold before relying]. ITAR: DDTC notification required in advance of the transfer; confirm acknowledgment before closing.
Closing day (June 30, ET). 8:30 walk-through call (counsel only) · 9:00 wires released: $40.5M seller, $4.5M escrow, payoff to lender · 9:30 confirmations circulated, signature pages released · 9:45 all-parties closing call · 10:00 announcement embargo lifts · 10:30 customer and employee notices.
---
Assumptions I made. Signing and closing are simultaneous [safe - stated]. The escrow agent is engaged and has run KYC [verify - this quietly costs deals two days]. The lender will issue a payoff within five business days [verify].
Where this is weakest. The landlord consent has no response after seven weeks and no fallback. The four software licenses are named-entity and non-transferable, which usually means repurchase at list price rather than consent. That is a budget item nobody has priced.
What only you can decide. Close on 6/30 with the landlord consent outstanding and a specific indemnity plus a short-term license-back (holds the date and the financing, but you are operating in a facility you do not have the right to occupy) or push to 7/14 (clean, but the seller's fiscal year closes 6/30 and their earn-out math changes). Also yours: whether to send courtesy notices or formal consent requests to the three silent customers: notice is faster, a request creates a paper trail if they later object.
What would make this materially better. (1) The executed APA Article VII so I can reconcile these conditions against the real ones. (2) The lender's payoff quote with a per-diem. (3) The four software license agreements: whether this is a consent problem or a purchase problem changes the budget.
Why this prompt is built the way it is
## Framework
1. **Conditions and deliverables are different things.** Conditions are gates that must be satisfied or waived. Deliverables are documents and money that change hands. No item belongs in both columns.
2. **Back-solve from the closing date.** Every line gets a calendar date. "Pre-closing" is not a deadline.
3. **Consents are the critical path.** Landlord, key customers, licensors, lenders, regulators. Name each counterparty, the clause that triggers consent, and who is chasing it.
4. **IP assignments sit outside the omnibus.** Recordation at the USPTO and the Copyright Office requires separate, recordable instruments. Signing the assignment and assumption agreement does not perfect the transfer.
5. **Decide the regulatory question, do not hedge it.** HSR either applies, does not apply for a stated reason, or cannot be determined without a number you do not have. Then run the industry list the asset mix actually triggers.
6. **Named owners only.** Buyer counsel, seller counsel, buyer officer, seller officer, IP counsel, escrow agent, filing service, lender. Never "the team."
7. **Closing day is a script.** Wire timing, signature release, recordation trigger, announcement. Then the post-closing tail with day counts.