This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
Treatment of every class, exit financing, equity treatment, effective date.
Revenue, EBITDA, capex, debt service, and minimum cash by year; monthly cash if available.
Last three years of revenue and EBITDA, trailing twelve months, and why the debtor filed.
Determines whether § 1129(a)(11) or the § 1191(c) disposable-income test governs.
Where the case is pending. New-value, market-test, and cramdown law varies sharply by circuit.
Flips the memo from a repair job to an attack plan.
Watch for these throughout
Subchapter V cramdown runs on the § 1191(c) disposable-income test, not § 1129(a)(11) feasibility verbatim. Confirm which standard the case is under before relying on any conclusion.
Coverage thresholds are industry- and lender-specific. A 1.10x floor is a heuristic, not a legal standard, and no Code section supplies a number.
New-value plans draw market-test scrutiny that differs by circuit and by judge. Confirm the local rule before assuming an auction provision is adequate.
Disclosure statement projections are testable at confirmation by deposition and expert testimony. Anything the model flags as unsupported will be the deposition topic.
Verify every Code citation. § 1129 is long, cross-referenced, and frequently misquoted from memory.