This page lists three turns, the messages you send to the AI one after another in the same chat, and then a check of the answer. Keep it open next to your chat. Each turn shows the next thing to paste, with the values you entered already filled in. Nothing is sent from this page, and your conversation stays in the AI tool you are using.
District or state court, the judge if you know them, and whether § 3553(a) or a state sentencing statute governs.
What he did, the loss or quantity, the calculation, agreed adjustments, and the resulting range.
The specific number, the supervision terms, the restitution schedule, and the variance grounds you intend to run.
What you can attach and what each item proves. The outline routes each one to a variance ground.
Watch for these throughout
Sentencing memoranda are public filings. Diagnoses, family details, and children's names go on the docket unless you move to seal or redact first. Decide before you draft, not after.
The disparity factor collapses without data. Verify any Commission statistic, JSIN median, or comparator case against the actual source; the model will produce plausible docket numbers that do not exist.
State sentencing regimes vary enormously: structured grids, mandatory minimums, pure discretion. Confirm the governing statute and the real range before relying on any § 3553(a)-shaped analysis.
Anything in the outline that contradicts the PSR will be quoted back by the government. Reconcile against the final PSR, not the draft.
Supervised-release conditions are easier to shape before imposition than to appeal after. Propose specific language rather than blanket objections.