Three turns and a check. Keep this open next to your chat: each step is the thing to paste next, with what you typed already carried across. Nothing is sent from here, and nothing on this page is a transcript. The conversation stays where you are having it.
The provision and its actual language, or the position being taken on it.
Size, industry, structure, and which side you are on.
The governing law and the market the deal sits in, since both move the comparison.
Your own closed files, a deal database, a published survey you subscribe to.
The claim as it was made, and who made it.
Watch for, the whole way through
The model has no deal data. Any percentage, median, or "most deals do X" claim it produces is fabricated, and it will sound authoritative enough to be repeated on a call.
Deal-points studies sample the deals their publishers see. A middle-market study and a large-cap study disagree about the same term for real reasons, and citing the wrong one is worse than citing nothing.
Market is not the same as right. A cap that is squarely market is still negligent if the realistic exposure on this deal sits above it.
Your own precedent cuts both ways. Before you cite your files as evidence, confirm the other side cannot point to a deal where you accepted the opposite.
Do not paste confidential deal documents or client terms unless your firm's AI policy and the engagement terms permit it.